The NHS Continuing Healthcare (CHC) Process – A Step-by-Step Guide
If you’ve been told your relative may qualify for NHS Continuing Healthcare (CHC) — or you’ve just received a refusal — the process can feel overwhelming.
This guide explains:
-
What NHS Continuing Healthcare is
-
Every stage of the CHC process
-
Where decisions commonly go wrong
-
Your appeal rights
-
When to seek professional support

What Is NHS Continuing Healthcare (CHC)?
NHS Continuing Healthcare is a package of care funded entirely by the NHS for adults with a primary health need.
It is:
-
Not means-tested
-
Not dependent on savings or property
-
Based on care needs - not diagnosis
If eligible, the NHS must fund:
-
Care home fees
-
Home care packages
-
Nursing support
-
Specialist health needs
The legal framework is governed by the National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare and NHS-Funded Nursing Care.
Overview: The 6 Stages of the CHC Process
The process
The Checklist
Full Assessment (DST / MDT)
Decision Letter
Local Resolution Appeal
Independent Review Panel (IRP)
Ombudsman
Each stage has different risks, rights, and opportunities.
Stage 1: The CHC Checklist
What is the Checklist?
The Checklist is a screening tool used to determine whether a full CHC assessment is required.
It should:
-
Be completed by a trained assessor
-
Involve family input
-
Consider current care records
-
Be scored against set thresholds
If the threshold is met → the case proceeds to full assessment.
Where Things Often Go Wrong
-
Checklist refused or delayed
-
Carried out without family present
-
Incorrect scoring
-
Assessor minimises needs
-
Told “they won’t qualify anyway”
A failed Checklist can be challenged.
If you are at this stage, see our CHC Application & Checklist Support service.
Stage 2: Full Assessment (DST / MDT)
If the Checklist passes, the NHS must arrange a Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) meeting.
The MDT completes the Decision Support Tool (DST).
What Is the DST?
The DST assesses 12 care domains, including:
-
Behaviour
-
Cognition
-
Mobility
-
Nutrition
-
Continence
-
Skin integrity
-
Medication
-
Psychological needs
Eligibility is determined using:
-
Nature
-
Intensity
-
Complexity
-
Unpredictability
This is where most eligibility decisions are effectively decided.
Common Problems at MDT Stage
-
Domains under-scored
-
Behaviour minimised
-
No proper analysis of complexity
-
Failure to apply “primary health need” correctly
-
ICB overturns MDT recommendation
If preparing for MDT, see our DST Representation & Evidence Pack Support.
Stage 3: The CHC Decision Letter
What to Check in the Decision Letter
Does it explain why eligibility was refused?
Does the rationale match the DST scores?
Has the Framework been correctly applied?
Were nature, intensity, complexity and unpredictability analysed?
If unsure, we offer a fixed-fee CHC Appeal Viability Review.
Stage 4: Local Resolution Meeting
This is the first formal appeal stage.
You submit written grounds of appeal and attend a review meeting with the ICB.
What Should Happen
-
Full reconsideration of evidence
-
Clear discussion of disputed domains
-
Framework applied correctly
What Often Happens Instead
-
Rubber-stamping the original decision
-
Limited analysis
-
Intimidating panel structure
Professional representation significantly improves clarity and structure at this stage.
Stage 5: Independent Review Panel (IRP)
If Local Resolution fails, the case can escalate to NHS England for Independent Review.
IRP focuses on:
-
Whether the National Framework was correctly followed
-
Whether process errors occurred
-
Whether the decision was rational
It is not simply a re-scoring exercise.
IRP is complex and evidence-driven.
Stage 6: Ombudsman
If procedural unfairness remains, a complaint can be made to:
Parliamentary & Health Service Ombudsman (England)
Public Services Ombudsman for Wales
The Ombudsman examines maladministration, not eligibility scoring.
Where Do Most Families Contact Us?
Most families contact us after receiving a refusal decision. While some seek support at the Checklist stage or before a Full Assessment (MDT), the most common entry point is immediately following a negative Decision Letter. At this stage, many families realise the scoring does not reflect the reality of their relative’s needs. Fewer cases begin at the Independent Review Panel (IRP) or Ombudsman stage, as these are typically escalations following earlier challenges. In short, support is most often sought once eligibility has been formally declined.
You can read a full step-by-step overview in our guide to the NHS Continuing Healthcare process.

How Long Does the CHC Process Take?
-
Checklist: 2–4 weeks (often delayed)
-
Full assessment: 4–12 weeks
-
Decision letter: 2–4 weeks post-MDT
-
Local Resolution: Several months
-
IRP: 6–12 months
-
Ombudsman: 12+ months
Delays are common.
Can CHC Be Backdated?
Yes.
If the NHS should have assessed earlier or wrongly refused eligibility, retrospective funding may be recoverable.
This is complex and evidence-heavy.
When Should You Seek Help?
You should consider professional support if:
-
The Checklist was refused
-
The MDT felt rushed
-
The DST does not reflect care reality
-
You’ve received a refusal letter
-
You feel the decision is unfair
-
You are considering IRP
Frequently Asked Questions
Diagnosis alone does not determine eligibility. Eligibility depends on the nature and complexity of health needs.
No. Savings and property do not affect eligibility.
There is no automatic score, but certain combinations strongly indicate eligibility under the Framework.
Usually appeals must be lodged within 6 months, but exceptions may apply.
The term “primary health need” is not explicitly defined in legislation. However, it is central to determining eligibility for NHS Continuing Healthcare (CHC).
The National Framework for NHS Continuing Healthcare explains that a person should be considered to have a primary health need where the nursing, healthcare treatment, or services they require are:
-
More than incidental or ancillary to the provision of accommodation that a local authority would otherwise provide under means-tested social care arrangements; or
-
Of a nature beyond what a local authority can lawfully provide.
In practical terms, this means the individual’s needs must be primarily health-related rather than social care-related.
-

